Not a correct export of subprocesses in HP-ALM with Bizagi
I am currently using Bizagi to model software process. I wish to then export the Bizagi model into HP-ALM with a xpdl format to make the work of creating and organizing exigences a little easier.
I have noticed that, in HP-ALM, the subprocess tool is not correctly understood, it 'copies' it as a regular activity. However the re-usable process, as it is exported in xpdl as another process, is decently taken in charge by ALM. Is it normal that the 'normal' subprocess, as the it is embedded in the flow of the process, is not decently modeled in the xpdl format? Should I cheat and model them as re-usable process when they are not?