Under Consideration

Artifacts size

Allow to rezise artifacts to a smaller size than 32x32 pixel--> no restriction in resizing.

Thank you for review

Lukas

photo
0

I would add that you can size also as big as you like an element. I would like to draw an activity overlapping 5 or 6 lanes.

photo
0

Dear Victor,

Having really large elements which overlap lanes is not visually ideal nor considered by the BPMN standard.

We are currently working on an improvement idea to allow changing the default size of shapes (to be released in the upcoming version), but this would not allow setting a size for them as large as you mention it.

Please take into account that you may use the Presentation mode or zoom options if you wish to present your process and its elements so that they are viewed larger.

Best regards,

photo
0

Daisuke Okuda wrote:

Dear Victor,

Having really large elements which overlap lanes is not visually ideal nor considered by the BPMN standard.

We are currently working on an improvement idea to allow changing the default size of shapes (to be released in the upcoming version), but this would not allow setting a size for them as large as you mention it.

Please take into account that you may use the Presentation mode or zoom options if you wish to present your process and its elements so that they are viewed larger.

Best regards,

Dear Daisuke,I know that BPMN standard is very narrow and very bpms and automation-oriented. Each activity must be in one lane because you want to point a performer (a human with a form or a system ) of this activityBizagi studio should be that strict, but Bizagi modeler could be more open-business-oriented minded.I mean, when modeling some diagrams that shouldn't be automated because they are at a generic level of detail and concerned with understanding the process, people represent processes that are done by different departments using a box over some lanes and this is clearer than to split that box in its activities to put each activity in each lane, because the diagram gets cluttered.This makes Bizagi modeler too focused in automating and not so much in BPM in a general sense.Regards,